Amber Listserv / copal

[glen]

well, I cannot call andy's tests verifiable of any conclusion. if this test were done under sterile,controlled conditions possibly they would hold more value, at this point they mean little. just as my tests or observations mean little.I understand most copals that have been been tested by carbon dating have been less than one million years old. the point I wanted to raise is, are the inclusions true fossils. do you agree with the Webster's definition? glen 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: /pipermail/amber_ambericawest.com/attachments/20060712/fbaa49dd/attachment.html